Car emissions – Taxis 4 Smart Cities http://www.taxis4smartcities.org/ Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:51:05 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/icon-2021-07-05T160153.519.png Car emissions – Taxis 4 Smart Cities http://www.taxis4smartcities.org/ 32 32 Do you need a loan for bad credit? Here are 6 things you should know. https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/do-you-need-a-loan-for-bad-credit-here-are-6-things-you-should-know/ https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/do-you-need-a-loan-for-bad-credit-here-are-6-things-you-should-know/#respond Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:50:58 +0000 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/?p=533 If you need to apply for a loan, it is possible to feel discouraged. Credit reports with derogatory marks and bad credit are not uncommon. FICO April 2018 data shows that one in 10 Americans has a FICO(r) Score below 550. This is bad credit. FICO reports that 23% have at least one account in collections. This could have […]]]>

If you need to apply for a loan, it is possible to feel discouraged.

Credit reports with derogatory marks and bad credit are not uncommon. FICO April 2018 data shows that one in 10 Americans has a FICO(r) Score below 550. This is bad credit. FICO reports that 23% have at least one account in collections. This could have a negative impact on your credit score.

Your credit history shows how much you’ve used credit and how well you repaid it. It can be more difficult to get loans at low interest rates if you have bad credit. Good credit can make it more simple. If your credit score isn’t good enough to get a loan, what should you do?

Payday loans are a more costly option good or bad credit.

1. What is bad credit?

Different companies use different credit scoring models to generate credit scores. FICO offers many scoring models that lenders may use to assess credit applications. The FICO(r) base scores, or FICO(r), are 300-850. FICO(r),8 credit scores are used for determining credit ranges.

  • Poor: 579 and lower
  • Fair: 580-669
  • Good: 670-739
  • Excellent: 740-799
  • Exceptional: 800+

FICO reported that the September 2019 average FICO(r) score was 706. However, those with lower credit scores than 670 might not be approved for certain types loans.

Bad credit can occur for many reasons. If you default on your payments, max out your credit cards, or have other negative marks like bankruptcy or foreclosure, your credit score can plummet.

2. Credit scores: Your credit score

This comparison will help you to understand how credit works and what credit scores mean.

You likely learned different subjects at school, such as English, math, and economics. Each assignment was assigned a grade, with an overall grade at its end. Your GPA is the sum of all the classes you took.

This is what will determine your credit scores and credit reports.

Your credit reports contain a complete list of all your owing money and information about how you have paid it back. Your credit scores will be closer to your grade point average. These scores are calculated from information in your credit reports. These scores help lenders to understand how you have handled credit in the past.

Credit is often referred to as a whole. Credit can refer to both your credit reports and your credit scores. When deciding whether you’re eligible for a loan, lenders will typically consider your credit scores and credit reports. Lenders often look at your credit score first to get a picture of your borrowing habits.

3. Who will lend bad credit customers money?

Lenders may have their own credit scores. If your score is below the threshold, lenders will not approve your loan request. While your scores might not meet the threshold, a lender may be more willing to review your credit reports in order to assess your credit history. Your lender might consider other factors when deciding whether you are eligible for a loan.

Different lenders may have different requirements for different types of financial products or types. FHA mortgages require that you have a credit score at least 580 to be eligible for the lowest downpayment requirement of 3.5 percent. Banks and credit unions will require credit scores of at minimum 600 to be eligible for a conventional mortgage.

Personal mortgage loans may not be available to those with lower credit scores than 500. Payday lenders may not consider your credit history, but charge high interest rates and fees.

4. What happens if I have poor credit?

You may believe that you have no other options than to borrow money, such as a car title or payday loan. These short-term loans aren’t subject to credit checks and could be appealing for people who don’t believe that they will be eligible for credit cards or traditional personal loans.

These loans can be extremely costly in the long-term.

These loans can have fees up to 400% which is an annual percentage fee. This is quite a contrast to a credit card which may have an annual percentage of 30%.

It might be a better idea to find lenders that will work with people with bad credit. You should have a budget and review the terms of your loan to determine if any fees, such as an origination fee, apply for.

Save money for big purchases and emergencies if you have the funds. This will enable you to concentrate on improving your credit score and not worrying about going into debt.

5. How much are bad credit loans cost?

Even if your credit is not perfect, you may still be eligible for a personal mortgage. However, you will be expected to pay higher interest rates.

Here’s an example that will show you how much you can get for more.

Let’s suppose your car has been damaged and you need a $2,500 personal loan. If your credit score is good (say 740 FICO(r),) a personal loan of $2,500 might be possible. With a monthly payment of $79.88, the interest rate will be 9.33%. Interest at this rate will cost $375.82 over the life of the loan.

Let’s suppose your credit score falls below 580. The interest rate you are approved for is 35.89%. Your monthly payment will be $114.35, and the interest rate for the loan term will be $1616.70.

This $2,500 personal loan will be paid over three years if you have bad credit.

6. Do you have bad credit? There are many options.

Bad credit does not have to be permanent. Most derogatory marks, such as late payments, foreclosures, and bankruptcy will disappear from credit reports after seven to ten year.

Even if you have filed bankruptcy, it is possible to improve credit. These are the steps you can take in order to achieve your goal.

First, check your credit reports. You can easily improve your credit score by disputing errors.

Next, learn about the factors that go into calculating your credit scores. These factors can be improved in order to improve your credit score. Paying your bills on time and paying off any debts, especially credit card debt, can help improve credit.

Bottom line

Bad credit can make it difficult to obtain a loan. It is possible to find trustworthy lenders that will work with you, even if your credit score is not good.

If you have poor credit, applying for a personal loan and making timely payments could improve your credit score. If you ever require it, this will help you build better credit.

]]>
https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/do-you-need-a-loan-for-bad-credit-here-are-6-things-you-should-know/feed/ 0
Hochul signs law requiring zero-emission passenger vehicles by 2035 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/hochul-signs-law-requiring-zero-emission-passenger-vehicles-by-2035/ https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/hochul-signs-law-requiring-zero-emission-passenger-vehicles-by-2035/#respond Wed, 08 Sep 2021 21:03:23 +0000 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/hochul-signs-law-requiring-zero-emission-passenger-vehicles-by-2035/ Governor of New York. Kathy hochulKathy Hochul Five Big Questions After Millions of People Lost Federal Unemployment Assistance. AG warns Texas over abortion law Biden approves disaster fund for NJ and New York state after Ida MORE floods (D) on Wednesday signed a bill that will require all passenger vehicles sold in the state to […]]]>

Governor of New York. Kathy hochulKathy Hochul Five Big Questions After Millions of People Lost Federal Unemployment Assistance. AG warns Texas over abortion law Biden approves disaster fund for NJ and New York state after Ida MORE floods (D) on Wednesday signed a bill that will require all passenger vehicles sold in the state to be emission-free by 2035.

The law will make New York City the second state after California to phase out greenhouse gas emissions from cars and light trucks. It also aims to eliminate emissions from medium and heavy commercial vehicles by 2045 and requires the creation of a detailed plan for the development of zero emission vehicles by 2023.

Meanwhile, Hochul signed an order directing the State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) to develop regulations to reduce pollution from trucks. Although the Hochul office did not disclose details of the proposed settlement, it predicted it would “speed up” sales of zero-emission trucks.

“New York is implementing the country’s most aggressive plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions affecting our climate and to meet our ambitious goals, we must reduce emissions from the transportation sector, currently the biggest source of pollution state climate, “Hochul said in a statement. statement Wednesday. “The new law and regulation mark a critical step in our efforts and will advance the transition to clean electric vehicles, while helping to reduce emissions in communities that have been overburdened by pollution from cars and trucks for decades. decades. “

“Once passed, these new regulations will require an increasing percentage of all new trucks sold in New York to be zero-emission vehicles starting in the 2025 model year, solidifying our state as a national leader in actions aimed at to fight against climate change while stimulating economic opportunities. and help reduce air pollution, ”said DEC Commissioner Basil Seggos.

The Biden administration has announced its goal of halving U.S. emissions by 2030 and reaching net zero by 2050. While much of that goal requires the cooperation of Congress, Hochul’s signing means that two of the country’s most populous states are working in the same direction.

The signing and the order also comes as the consequences of climate change hit the New York area.

The remnants of Hurricane Ida led to New York City’s very first sudden flood emergency declaration last week, as parts of New Jersey experienced an unprecedented tornado.

]]>
https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/hochul-signs-law-requiring-zero-emission-passenger-vehicles-by-2035/feed/ 0
Genesis presents its dual electrification strategy https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/genesis-presents-its-dual-electrification-strategy/ https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/genesis-presents-its-dual-electrification-strategy/#respond Wed, 01 Sep 2021 23:00:00 +0000 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/genesis-presents-its-dual-electrification-strategy/ Hyundai Motor Group luxury brand Genesis has announced its zero-emission electrification plan. The company intends to focus on two types of vehicles – battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCVs), while there is no word on conventional hybrids. or plug-in hybrids. All new Genesis car models, launching from 2025, will be zero-emission […]]]>

Hyundai Motor Group luxury brand Genesis has announced its zero-emission electrification plan.

The company intends to focus on two types of vehicles – battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCVs), while there is no word on conventional hybrids. or plug-in hybrids.

All new Genesis car models, launching from 2025, will be zero-emission and over time, from 2030, 100% of the range will be zero emissions. In addition, by 2035, the company intends to be carbon neutral.

“The brand’s new vehicles will all be purely electric from 2025. To drive the switch to electrification, Genesis will focus on a dual electrification strategy involving fuel cell and battery electric vehicles. Genesis will strive to develop purely electrical technologies such as new fuel cell systems with higher power output and electrical systems that help improve efficiency.In addition, Genesis will be dedicated to building a new generation technology that derives better performance and efficiency from lithium-ion batteries.

Along with the dual electrification strategy, Genesis has announced its goal of pursuing a carbon neutral brand by 2035. This is the first time that a member of the Hyundai Motor group has announced the transition and will consolidate the brand as a leader in the luxury vehicle market. “

Genesis is targeting an electric range of a total of eight models and plans to expand its global sales to 400,000 per year (on average 50,000 per model).

The Genesis EV teaser

The company has already showcased the first two battery-electric models: the G80 model, the brand’s first electric car, and the recently unveiled Genesis GV60. The third model will be unveiled later this year.

Jay Chang, Global Head of Genesis, said:

“I am extremely pleased to announce Genesis’ new vision for a sustainable future as we open a new chapter in our history. As we continue to design a new dimension of the customer experience and build an authentic relationship with our customers, Genesis will take bold steps to lead the era of electrification into a sustainable future. “

“Our new electric range is the ideal platform to increase our interface with our customers,” said Luc Donckerwolke, Creative Director of Genesis. “We aim to interact with all of their senses. Our new architecture will integrate bold technologies with breathtaking designs while delivering heartfelt detail-driven experiences. Warm and exquisite care will be our differentiator.

We assume that Genesis has been at the forefront of electrification within the Hyundai Motor group and mainstream brands – Hyundai and Kia will follow towards zero emissions.

]]>
https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/genesis-presents-its-dual-electrification-strategy/feed/ 0
Electric Dreams: The company that converts beautiful classic cars to run on modern electric batteries https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/electric-dreams-the-company-that-converts-beautiful-classic-cars-to-run-on-modern-electric-batteries/ https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/electric-dreams-the-company-that-converts-beautiful-classic-cars-to-run-on-modern-electric-batteries/#respond Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:00:00 +0000 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/electric-dreams-the-company-that-converts-beautiful-classic-cars-to-run-on-modern-electric-batteries/ Classic and Electric Vehicles in Durham ensures that vintage cars can continue to be driven in the future, while fighting climate change and helping the environment Converting classic cars to run on modern electric batteries is a niche but growing market operated by a handful of companies in the UK. One such company is Durham […]]]>

Classic and Electric Vehicles in Durham ensures that vintage cars can continue to be driven in the future, while fighting climate change and helping the environment

Converting classic cars to run on modern electric batteries is a niche but growing market operated by a handful of companies in the UK.

One such company is Durham City’s Classic and Electric Vehicles, run by George Kinghorn, whose goal is to get people to use electric cars.

Environmentally conscious drivers with a passion for classic cars can now have a vintage vehicle that has been converted into a modern electric battery using recycled Nissan Leaf components, which means it can continue to operate. be driven on the road every day for years to come in a non-polluting manner for a price of around £ 20,000

Although the initial cost is high once converted to electric, the vehicles are much cheaper and easier to use from a fuel and maintenance standpoint, on a hundred per mile basis they cost around a quarter of what you would pay for a gasoline or diesel car. .

If you want to own a classic car in the future, it will have to be electric. By driving an electric vehicle you are helping to save the planet, they are obviously emission free and if there is a renewable energy source for the electricity used to charge it you are helping to fight climate change and protect the environment. ‘environment.

Owners of electric cars will also tell you that they are much more fun to drive, that there is no rattling of motors or jerky gear changes, that they run quietly and smoothly and provide a driving experience. much more pleasant overall ride, especially when under the body of a nice old classic.

]]>
https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/electric-dreams-the-company-that-converts-beautiful-classic-cars-to-run-on-modern-electric-batteries/feed/ 0
EPA rejected warnings that its auto emissions plan was too weak https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/epa-rejected-warnings-that-its-auto-emissions-plan-was-too-weak/ https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/epa-rejected-warnings-that-its-auto-emissions-plan-was-too-weak/#respond Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:39:21 +0000 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/epa-rejected-warnings-that-its-auto-emissions-plan-was-too-weak/ WASHINGTON – The White House and other administration officials told the Environmental Protection Agency that its industry-backed plan to tighten auto emission limits was too lax, but the agency pushed back those warnings and released the proposal with provisions that could reduce its bite. The discord was revealed in thousands of pages of correspondence, analyzes […]]]>

WASHINGTON – The White House and other administration officials told the Environmental Protection Agency that its industry-backed plan to tighten auto emission limits was too lax, but the agency pushed back those warnings and released the proposal with provisions that could reduce its bite.

The discord was revealed in thousands of pages of correspondence, analyzes and recently published drafts from an interagency review of the extent that the EPA unveiled earlier this month and should be finalized by the end of the year. The correspondence highlights tensions within the administration over the aggressiveness with which to enforce regulations to tackle climate change, especially when efforts are opposed by industry.

“This clearly shows that many officials in the Biden administration believed that the EPA should have come up with stricter and more efficient clean car standards to tackle climate change,” Amit Narang, a regulatory expert at Public citizen, said in an interview.

The problem is the EPA’s proposal to tighten federal limits on greenhouse gas emissions from cars and light trucks, which had been weakened under President Donald Trump. The new measure aligns closely with a much stricter auto emissions plan chartered under President Barack Obama in 2012. By model year 2026, the EPA’s new proposal would result in federal limits on most stringent greenhouse gas emissions to date on passenger cars and light trucks. .

The proposed standards, along with the administration’s efforts to promote the use of electric vehicles, would be “the boldest on the books,” a White House spokesman said. The spokesperson stressed that this measure is still only a proposal and subject to public comment.

Still, several White House and other U.S. officials reviewing the EPA’s draft last month urged an even stronger approach. And they warned the agency that actual emission reductions could be reduced by the provisions the EPA incorporated into its proposal, including the double-counting of electric vehicle sales and so-called flexibilities that grant credit. added to technologies that make cars more fuel efficient but don’t necessarily show up in exhaust readings.

While the Trump administration has removed some of these incentives in its 2020 automotive rule, the EPA’s new proposal would revive the special treatment of sales of electric, plug-in hybrids, and fuel cell vehicles for model years 2022 to 2025. vans to apply for an offset credit.

Officials across President Joe Biden’s administration – who are not named in recently released documents – have unsuccessfully urged the EPA to come up with more stringent requirements.

“Most reviewers suggested considering a stricter proposal,” and at least one person recommended stricter standards for later model years, the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs told the EPA last month, as it summarized comments on the agency’s draft.

Several people urged the EPA to adopt a more stringent alternative that had been described by the agency because it “has higher net benefits” and would encourage greater adoption of electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids, according to the summary.

Officials also questioned the EPA’s decision to give special treatment to the sale of electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids and fuel cell vehicles, warning that they “are not technologically neutral and reduce the effective rigor of the rule “. While these flexibilities may be necessary to help automakers take a big leap in rigor for the 2023 model year, they could translate into a smaller share of electric vehicles on the road, the Bureau warned. information and regulatory affairs.

The EPA program has enabled automakers to effectively claim additional credit for the sales of certain low-emission alternative vehicles, an approach that helps meet global automotive pollution mandates.

At one point, at least one administration official rejected the EPA’s claim that increasing and extending multipliers for the sale of fully electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids, and battery-powered vehicles hydrogen fuel “would help bring certain technologies to market more quickly.” The person cited third-party research that “suggests that extending multiplier credits could counterintuitively reduce the penetration of electric vehicles.”

The EPA has made changes in response to some of the White House’s concerns, including soliciting public comment on whether to ditch multipliers for alternative vehicles. The agency also asked for public comment on setting a stricter standard for the 2026 model year, in response to the White House’s exhortation.

However, the EPA ultimately stood firm in maintaining its credit and incentive plan, which was seen as helping the auto industry adjust to rapidly escalating emissions requirements for the year. model 2023.

In drafting its proposal, the EPA sought to strengthen standards far beyond the requirements established under Trump. The agency was also under pressure to reflect the efforts of five automakers who voluntarily pledged to further reduce their emissions as part of a deal with California regulators last year.

Public comment

The EPA is now accepting public comments on its proposal. He could still move to strengthen his final rule, which is expected to be imposed later this year. Environmentalists are pushing the EPA to toughen the final regulation.

The EPA defended its approach and said it welcomed comments on the proposal.

“The proposed rule would put the EPA’s clean car program back on track using technology available today to make vehicles cleaner, reduce long-term emissions and save consumers money,” said agency in a press release sent by email. “By the 2026 model year, the standards would be the most stringent federal greenhouse gas standards ever adopted.”

The White House’s concerns echo those voiced by environmentalists, who have spoken out against incentives and credits that make it easier for automakers to meet annual limits without actually reducing actual emissions on the road.

“At the end of the day, the proposal they put forward is definitely below 2012 standards,” Dave Cooke, senior vehicle analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a telephone interview. It also doesn’t meet the trajectory needed to meet Biden’s goal of having half of all vehicles sold will be electric models by 2030, Cooke said.

Cooke’s modeling suggests that the EPA’s proposal would produce about 30% less emission reductions over the life of the affected vehicles than what would have been achieved under the 2012 Obama-era requirements.

]]>
https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/epa-rejected-warnings-that-its-auto-emissions-plan-was-too-weak/feed/ 0
Here’s how automakers plan to go zero emissions over the next few years https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/heres-how-automakers-plan-to-go-zero-emissions-over-the-next-few-years/ https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/heres-how-automakers-plan-to-go-zero-emissions-over-the-next-few-years/#respond Mon, 23 Aug 2021 15:00:00 +0000 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/heres-how-automakers-plan-to-go-zero-emissions-over-the-next-few-years/ Vehicles powered by the powerful internal combustion engine (ICE) are losing their grip on the automotive world. Their main challengers are also powerful electric vehicles, which can come in various forms. With technology slowly but surely catching up with the problems with electrified vehicles, ICE-powered vehicles may be phased out in the years to come. […]]]>

Vehicles powered by the powerful internal combustion engine (ICE) are losing their grip on the automotive world. Their main challengers are also powerful electric vehicles, which can come in various forms. With technology slowly but surely catching up with the problems with electrified vehicles, ICE-powered vehicles may be phased out in the years to come.

While Tesla Motors may not be the first automaker to build electric vehicles, the company has played a significant role in putting them in the spotlight with offerings like the evolving Model S. convincing part of the drivers that electric vehicles are not only good, but better alternatives to ICE vehicles, especially when it comes to zero emissions.

Now, Tesla is not alone in the game. Giant automakers such as GM, Ford, Stellantis and others have joined the fray to bring their own electrified vehicles to market. They all have different plans on how to achieve zero emissions in whole or in part in the future. These plans could be pretty drastic, involving billions of dollars in investment, but all in all they could change the landscape for the entire auto industry.

All zero-emission light vehicles for GM by 2035

GM's electric future

By GM

GM presented an electrification plan driven by its Ultium batteries and a new global electric vehicle platform. After launching the new GMC Hummer EV, GM is looking to add more electrified vehicles to its portfolio. In fact, GM hopes to deliver 30 all-electric models to the world by 2025, with battery-electric vehicles making up 40% of its lineup in the United States.

But GM is not done yet. The automaker plans to get rid of the tailpipe emissions of all of its new light vehicles by 2035 and become carbon neutral by 2040. To achieve this, GM is investing around $ 27 billion in electric and autonomous vehicles. over the next five years. The new money is expected to help GM upgrade its manufacturing facilities to be more capable of building electric vehicles.

Four new electrified platforms for Stellantis by 2025

Zero emissions 100% freedom

Via Stellantis

Now made up of 14 brands, Stellantis wants electrified cars to represent 70% of its sales in Europe and 35% in the United States by 2030. For this year, Stellantis electric vehicles only represent 4% of sales in the United States. United and 14% of European deliveries. At the heart of this electrification plan are four upcoming platforms for electrified models. Two of these platforms (STLA Medium and STLA Large) will be online by 2023, the other two arriving in 2024 (STLA Frame) and 2025 (STLA Small).

Stellantis is more ambitious in its electrification plan in Europe than in the United States. As expected, Ford wants 98% of its models in Europe to have an electrified version (battery-powered EV and plug-in hybrid) by 2025. In the United States, around 96% of its offerings will have electrified versions by the same. year. All European models will have a battery-powered EV version by 2030.

RELATED: This Is How Stellantis Will Use Four BEV-Centric Platforms As The Backbone Of Its Electrified Vehicles

Electric vehicles will account for up to half of Ford’s sales in the United States by 2030

Ford EV family

Via Ford

Ford has already started electrifying its lineup, starting with the most popular such as the Mustang Mach-E (on the market), the F-150 Lightning (2022) and E-Transit (late 2021). With sales exceeding expectations, Ford will see electric vehicles represent between 40% and 50% of its sales in the United States by 2030. The automaker is also seeing electric vehicles seize at least 40% of its sales. global sales volume by 2040.

To pursue this goal, Ford will invest more than $ 30 billion in vehicle electrification through 2025. It is also busy establishing electric vehicle manufacturing footprints around the world. It has four new factories in North America, including the new Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Michigan. This complex will build the F-150 Lightning and the F-150 PowerBoost Hybrid. Ford seeks to achieve global carbon neutrality by 2050.

VW Group wants global electric vehicle leadership by 2025

VW charging station

Via Volkswagen

The current electric offensive of the Volkswagen group is driven by its modular electric drive matrix (MEB). Since the launch of the VW ID.3 in 2019, the VW Group has introduced electric vehicles in all of its brands. The MEB was just the beginning, and it is at the heart of the VW brand’s goal to become a world leader in the electric vehicle market by 2025. All of its current platforms: MQB, MSB, MLB, as well as MEB and PPE – will be replaced by the SSP (Scalable Systems Platform). This means a single mechatronics platform for all future products, whether ICE or electrified.

VW expects its battery-electric vehicles to account for 50% of its sales by 2030. Its 2040 plans are more ambitious, as it predicts that nearly 100% of all new Group vehicles in key markets will be zero emission. The Group intends to be completely climate neutral by 2050 at the latest.

RELATED: The VW Group’s Recent Increase in Electric Vehicle Sales Is Proof The Electric Revolution Is Here

At least 1 million zero-emission Toyotas sold by 2030

Toyota electrification plans

Via Toyota

Currently, Toyota offers four electric vehicles, 45 hybrids, four plug-in hybrids and two fuel cell electric vehicles. It will bring that number to 70 electrified models by 2025. The 15 additional models will all be electric vehicles, seven of which will be part of the Toyota bZ series (which stands for Beyond Zero). This new series will be based on a new flexible platform developed jointly with Subaru.

So far, Toyota has launched electrification initiatives with partners such as Aurora, Shell, Panasonic, SoftBank and Mazda. It also pledged to sell more than one million zero-emission vehicles by 2030. This new era for Toyota was heralded with the unveiling of the concept version of the Toyota bZ4X in China.

Source: GM, Stellantis, Ford, VW Group, Toyota


Tesla Superchargers
That’s why Tesla opens its charging network to other electric vehicles

Is this another move by Elon Musk to shape the stock market, or is Tesla really opening its chargers to everyone?

Read more


About the Author

]]>
https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/heres-how-automakers-plan-to-go-zero-emissions-over-the-next-few-years/feed/ 0
Children in CAR and Nigeria face worst climate risks – UNICEF https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/children-in-car-and-nigeria-face-worst-climate-risks-unicef/ https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/children-in-car-and-nigeria-face-worst-climate-risks-unicef/#respond Sun, 22 Aug 2021 23:26:55 +0000 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/children-in-car-and-nigeria-face-worst-climate-risks-unicef/ The United Nations Children’s Fund has ranked Nigeria and Chad as the second country where children are most exposed to climate change. UNICEF, in a report titled “Children’s Climate Risk Index,” used data to generate new global evidence on the number of children currently exposed to climate and environmental risks, shocks and stresses. He noted […]]]>

The United Nations Children’s Fund has ranked Nigeria and Chad as the second country where children are most exposed to climate change.

UNICEF, in a report titled “Children’s Climate Risk Index,” used data to generate new global evidence on the number of children currently exposed to climate and environmental risks, shocks and stresses.

He noted that a billion children around the world were at risk.

The CCRI helps to understand and measure the likelihood of climatic and environmental shocks or stresses leading to erosion of development progress, worsening deprivation and / or humanitarian situations affecting children or vulnerable households and groups.

Of the 163 countries on the list, the top 13 were African. Ranked from worst to safest, the top 10 in order were Central African Republic (1), Chad and Nigeria (2), Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Somalia (4), Niger, Sudan South (7), DR Congo (9), Angola, Cameroon, Madagascar, Mozambique (10).

Foreword to the report signed by Adriana Calderón, Mexico; Farzana Jhumu, Bangladesh; Eric Njuguna, Kenya and; Greta Thunberg, Sweden, said: “The Children’s Climate Risk Index ranks countries based on children’s vulnerability to environmental stresses and extreme weather events.

“He finds that children in the Central African Republic, Chad, Nigeria, Guinea and Guinea Bissau are most at risk.

“And yet these countries are among the least responsible for creating the problem, with the 33 extremely high risk countries collectively emitting only 9% of global carbon dioxide emissions.

“On the other hand, the 10 most emitting countries collectively represent nearly 70% of global emissions. Only one of these countries is classified as extremely high risk in the index. We cannot allow this injustice to continue.

“It is immoral that the countries which have done the least suffer first and the worst. Governments and businesses must urgently work to tackle the root causes of climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the Paris Agreement.

Responding to the report, UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore said: “It is already clear that children are more vulnerable to climatic and environmental shocks than adults.

“However, this report examines for the first time exactly how many children live in areas facing multiple climate and environmental risks that overlap, trigger, reinforce and amplify, combined with data on availability and availability. quality of essential services such as health care, education. and water and sanitation to give real insight into the impact of the climate crisis on children.

She added that to tackle the climate crisis, all parts of society, including governments and businesses, need to act.

Copyright PUNCH.

All rights reserved. This material and any other digital content on this website may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without the express prior written permission of PUNCH.

Contact: [email protected]

]]>
https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/children-in-car-and-nigeria-face-worst-climate-risks-unicef/feed/ 0
Giving people money to buy electric vehicles works https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/giving-people-money-to-buy-electric-vehicles-works/ https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/giving-people-money-to-buy-electric-vehicles-works/#respond Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:49:00 +0000 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/giving-people-money-to-buy-electric-vehicles-works/ There are no more petrol Fiat 500s. They are all fully electric.Photo: Decree Is it possible that the simplest and most effective plan to get people to switch from gasoline-powered cars to electric cars is motivated by nationalist jealousy. All this and more in The morning shift by August 11, 2021. 1st gear: Italy gives […]]]>

There are no more petrol Fiat 500s.  They are all fully electric.

There are no more petrol Fiat 500s. They are all fully electric.
Photo: Decree

Is it possible that the simplest and most effective plan to get people to switch from gasoline-powered cars to electric cars is motivated by nationalist jealousy. All this and more in The morning shift by August 11, 2021.

1st gear: Italy gives people a lot of money to switch to an EV

I was surprised to learn today that Italy has just overtaken Norway in EV / PHEV, given that Norway has been the icon of EVs in Europe for ages and Italy is the place where they make Lamborghinis:

I was surprised again when I researched more electric and plug-in hybrid vehicle sales in Italy and saw that they were on the rise. 123 percent year over year back in February. Admittedly, it is not the biggest slice of the market, because CleanTechnica bullet point summary this month:

  • 2019 – plug-in vehicles held 0.9% market share (0.6% BEV, 0.3% PHEV)
  • 2020 – plug-in vehicles had 4.3% market share (2.3% BEV, 2.0% PHEV)
  • 2021 (YTD) – plug-in vehicles held 7.4% market share (3.1% BEV, 4.3% PHEV)

How did it all happen? Give people a lot of money to buy electric vehicles. Of Electrive.com in 2020:

The premium increase will apply from August 1 until the end of this year – for electric and hybrid vehicles up to a gross list price of 61,000 euros. In concrete terms, purely electric vehicles will be subsidized up to 6,000 euros during this period instead of the previous 4,000 euros. Anyone who scrapped their old heat engine as part of the purchase of the electric vehicle will even receive 10,000 euros (compared to 6,000 euros previously).

Hybrids with CO2 emissions between 21 and 60 grams per kilometer will be subsidized up to 3,500 euros or 6,500 euros if an old car is taken out of service at the same time. These prices were previously 1,500 and 2,500 euros respectively. The increased incentives are financed partly by the state and partly by the automakers. Germany, Austria and France had already initiated a premium increase on a similar scale.

This has been in the works since 2018, as part of a specific plan to beat Norway, as Automotive news Europe reported at the time:

Italy’s new populist government intends to put 1 million electric vehicles on the country’s roads by 2022 with the aim of growing from the region’s weakest electric vehicle market to replacing Norway as its biggest. strong.

Italy has maintained these grants in 2021 and they look like they work!

2nd gear: Oops! US infrastructure bill gives $ 200 billion to new highways

Government money is not always easy to spend, as a triple Democratic majority ends up with a somewhat compromised infrastructure bill. I was particularly charmed by Transportation For America’s statement “Senate makes historic investment in yesterday’s transportation priorities. “There are a lot of individual issues with the huge cash injection, all of which are well detailed in this excellent Streetsblog article. My favorite thing is that we are giving the highways $ 200 billion with no real restrictions on how it is spent, because the National association of city transport officials details:

Although the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned As our planet heads towards an increasingly uninhabitable future, the infrastructure bill passed today by the Senate keeps our nation on a dangerous and unsustainable path. He continues to prioritize building the infrastructure that contributes the most to America’s worst safety record and extraordinarily high climate emissions: new highways. With transportation being the largest source of climate emissions in the United States, and 80% of those from driving, the Senate bill goes in the wrong direction, providing $ 200 billion in funding with virtually no restrictions. in this unsustainable mode.

America is really good at building giant highways and everything else is like running a container ship.

3rd gear: the Covid epidemic in Malaysia will slow down the Nissan plant in Tennessee

What do we mean when we say Covid is a global pandemic, and not just something that exists on a personal or national level? Everyone who works at Nissan’s Smyrna, Tennessee plant will be sent home due to an outbreak in Malaysia because Automotive News reports:

A new outbreak of COVID-19 at a microchip supplier factory in Malaysia has led Nissan to shut down production lines at its large assembly plant in Smyrna, Tennessee, until the end of the month.

Nissan North America did not disclose the name of the supplier, but said the plant would shut down during the weeks of August 16 and 23. Nissan said it now plans to restart lines on August 30.

As always, immunization efforts must be seen as a global effort, and we must end vaccine apartheid before we can be safe, even here at home.

4th gear: please take advantage of this article saying auto makers should advertise themselves

I’m in love with this Bloomberg article, who innocently asks why automakers don’t advertise gasoline-powered cars, which to date represent the vaaaaaaaaaaaaast the majority of their profits:

I was scrolling Twitter recently when I came across this promoted tweet from Ford who said: “We take our icons and make them electric. What else will it take for electric vehicles to become mainstream? “

There are many answers to this question. Some of the most obvious: Do more in higher volumes so you can achieve economies of scale. Greatly reduce the cost to consumers. Encourage dealers to actually sell them. Make it easier to recharge batteries, especially for people who may live in apartment buildings. The list goes on.

For me, there is one answer that is blindingly obvious: to talk about the link between the internal combustion engine and asthma. I’m not a marketing expert at all, but the relationship between vehicle emissions and air quality is clear: vehicle fumes, with a high concentration of carbon monoxide, are considered among the worst pollutants. I remain furious with Volkswagen, which went to great lengths to cheat on the emissions tests before they were taken by the smog cops to the California Air Resources Board.

I like the article because it does the job of pointing out that even though automakers promote electric vehicles, they still make huge sums of money from internal combustion. Our current path will not lead to salvation.

5th gear: and also enjoy this article explaining how electric vehicles don’t erase the costs of owning a car

This post is even smarter and more innocent, which points out that electric vehicles take a long time to charge, and if you’re not a wealthy owner with a charger in your garage, that means a lot of time spent at charging stations. This means a new burden on the poor, for the Financial Time points out:

Owners of existing electric vehicles, most of whom have high incomes, don’t seem to mind the extra effort. Why should they. Having cash on hand means being able to splurge, among other things, in a personal garage, where most EVs are completed. If you are rich enough, you can just set it and forget about it. Even if you can’t recharge, chances are you will have a second car backing up as well.

Poor Americans are unlucky, often living in dense urban housing that lacks reliable access to electricity, let alone dedicated parking spaces.

The proposed solution is a national network of shippers. The US Senate recently reached a bipartisan infrastructure deal that provides $ 7.5 billion for charging infrastructure along major highways and corridors, with the goal of making charging stations as ubiquitous as gas stations. . A related effort aims to promote “fair” EV charging through accelerated public investments. But what is equitable about the rich man charging his car at home while the poor man is in the rain?

The current underlying this article is that all cars impose a burden on their owners, and that all of our towns and cities are functionally taxing people with the costs of owning a car. Electric vehicles may not have tailpipe emissions, but they don’t solve any of the problems with cars in general.

Reverse: The most romantic of all the great pilots

I’m not sure a racing driver has more stories about them than Tazio Nuvolari:

Neutral: how cheap is an EV?

At one point do you wonder if government money could be better spent than making electric vehicles virtually free? Or is there no limit to lower prices for electric vehicles?

]]>
https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/giving-people-money-to-buy-electric-vehicles-works/feed/ 0
Biden’s executive order on electric vehicles could prove to be counterproductive https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/bidens-executive-order-on-electric-vehicles-could-prove-to-be-counterproductive/ https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/bidens-executive-order-on-electric-vehicles-could-prove-to-be-counterproductive/#respond Mon, 09 Aug 2021 16:59:35 +0000 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/bidens-executive-order-on-electric-vehicles-could-prove-to-be-counterproductive/ On August 5, President Biden issued an executive order setting the goal that by 2030 half of new vehicles sold in the United States must be electric, including fuel cell electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids and full battery electric vehicles. Today, only about 3% of new vehicles sold are electric. According to Biden, the measure “will […]]]>

On August 5, President Biden issued an executive order setting the goal that by 2030 half of new vehicles sold in the United States must be electric, including fuel cell electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids and full battery electric vehicles. Today, only about 3% of new vehicles sold are electric. According to Biden, the measure “will improve our economy and public health, strengthen energy security, secure consumer savings, advance environmental justice and tackle the climate crisis.” In fact, he is likely to do the opposite of all of these things.

Climate change is the reason given behind the movement. Biden’s announcement is timed to coincide with the August 11 meeting of the California Air Resources Board, which will discuss proposed regulations to implement Governor Gavin Newsom’s executive order that all new vehicles sold in the Golden State will be electric. by 2035. Biden wants to engage with California and other states seeking to reduce their emissions. Electric vehicles have lower tailpipe emissions, so they are cleaner on the road. But they’re not emissions-free: the electricity to run them has to be produced somewhere, and renewables alone can’t currently power America’s electric car fleet.

The order will have geopolitical consequences. The United States has achieved energy security by becoming a net exporter of oil and natural gas; imposing the sale of electric vehicles would weaken this security. In addition, this requirement could increase the production of electric vehicle batteries in China, which already dominates the market. The order aims to encourage the production of batteries in the United States, but it is difficult to see how America can produce them cheaply.

Any increased reliance on Chinese battery production will make Biden’s order counterproductive for the environment. Despite Xi Jinping’s lofty promises of carbon neutrality by 2060, China was responsible for 27% of greenhouse gas emissions in 2019, exceeding those of all other developed countries combined. Battery production in China today depends on coal-fired power plants; As Chinese battery production increases, global emissions will also increase. Batteries should be transported to America and disposed of when finished; extracting ingredients from batteries imposes significant ecological costs.

Consumers are also the losers. Electric vehicles are more expensive than comparable gasoline cars, so Americans should spend more to buy the same type of vehicle. The base price of the Ford F-150 electric pickup, for example, is $ 40,000 to $ 10,000 more than the gasoline model, the best-selling vehicle in the United States Either Uncle Sam will subsidize vehicles electrics and will increase the deficit, ie Americans will have to spend more on the same car. In neither case will the economy or the consumer be better off. Finally, requiring the sale of electric vehicles hurts low-income Americans who cannot afford expensive electric cars as easily.

Americans do not need the government to tell them when to buy an electric vehicle. When they want to drive electric cars, the offer will materialize. Until then, the warrants will be costly and counterproductive.

Photo by Hendrik Schmidt / picture alliance via Getty Images

]]>
https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/bidens-executive-order-on-electric-vehicles-could-prove-to-be-counterproductive/feed/ 0
View from Away: Biden must put the pedal to metal on zero-emission cars https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/view-from-away-biden-must-put-the-pedal-to-metal-on-zero-emission-cars/ https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/view-from-away-biden-must-put-the-pedal-to-metal-on-zero-emission-cars/#respond Mon, 09 Aug 2021 08:00:48 +0000 https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/view-from-away-biden-must-put-the-pedal-to-metal-on-zero-emission-cars/ President Joe Biden is right. Electric vehicles are the future. But for the sake of the planet, the future must come much sooner than the president and the automakers predict. On Thursday, Biden proposed new fuel efficiency and exhaust emission standards for passenger cars and trucks that would effectively reverse President Trump’s clean-car setback, bringing […]]]>

President Joe Biden is right. Electric vehicles are the future. But for the sake of the planet, the future must come much sooner than the president and the automakers predict.

On Thursday, Biden proposed new fuel efficiency and exhaust emission standards for passenger cars and trucks that would effectively reverse President Trump’s clean-car setback, bringing U.S.-made vehicles back to the standards set. in place by the Obama administration. It is a return to what should have been the status quo.

The president also signed an executive order setting an ambitious but voluntary target that by 2030, half of new vehicles sold in the United States will be zero-emission models, including battery-electric, plug-in hybrid or battery-electric models. fuel. The Big Three American automakers were aiming a little lower, announcing their “common aspiration” that zero-emission vehicles account for 40 to 50% of their sales in the United States.

Here’s the hard reality: the status quo is not sustainable, and goals and aspirations are no longer enough. It should be obvious by now that climate change is wreaking havoc and destruction across the world. Drastic measures will be needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions enough to avert a climate catastrophe. In the United States, where gasoline-powered cars and trucks are the primary source of greenhouse gas emissions, that means accelerating the transition to clean vehicles.

The signs coming out of the dealerships were not good. Over the years, consumers have bought more and more gas guzzling SUVs and trucks. Electric vehicles only account for 2% of the US new car sales market, which is less than in China and many European countries. In May, the International Energy Agency warned that governments will have to end the sale of new internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035 in order to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions enough to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. The United States therefore has a long way to go.

The country wasted precious time and a drive towards clean cars during the Trump administration. Pushed by automakers, Trump relaxed Obama-era standards that required cars and light trucks to become increasingly fuel efficient; by 2025, they were expected to average over 50 miles per gallon. Automakers were to meet the target by developing and selling more hybrid and electric models, gradually reducing tailpipe pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

Trump’s standard required automakers to reach an average of 40 mpg by 2026, which would have allowed companies to continue producing more gas-guzzling SUVs and trucks. Biden’s proposal, which has yet to go through the rulemaking process, would reset the average fuel economy target to over 50 mpg by 2026. Biden also asked his administration to start developing Stricter fuel economy and emissions standards for 2027 and beyond.

At least in the short term, the United States is back to where it was four years ago, while other countries have continued to move forward, setting high targets for zero vehicle deployment. issue. China in particular has embraced electric vehicles, spurring the development of battery technology and a supply chain for electric vehicle manufacturing while increasing private investment in the field. Now, there is real concern that the lethargy of American automakers during the Trump years could end up hurting the global competitiveness of American industry.

Critical environmental and economic policies should not switch so easily between jurisdictions. While Biden’s voluntary target of 50% zero-emission vehicle sales by 2030 is a good start, his administration and Congress must translate that target into law. They are also to follow through on funding to help build a nationwide network of electric vehicle charging stations and provide financial incentives for customers to purchase zero-emission vehicles – two elements of the large-scale initial infrastructure proposal. presidential wingspan that were either slashed or eliminated in the bipartisan bill before the Senate. Biden should make it clear to automakers and the public that the future is truly electric.

Los Angeles Times Editorial

Visit latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Use the form below to reset your password. When you submit your account email, we’ll send you an email with a reset code.

]]>
https://www.taxis4smartcities.org/view-from-away-biden-must-put-the-pedal-to-metal-on-zero-emission-cars/feed/ 0